
I know that he’s not classified as one, but I think that the first futurist I was exposed to might have been Walt Disney. That’s a theme for another conversation though. I do know that Alvin Toffler and John Naisbitt were the first “official” futurists I encountered. I remember getting both Future Shock and Megatrends as gifts. There was a sparkle in the eyes of the givers as they said, “We think you’ll like these. They’re right up your alley.” I reminded them that I was a tennis pro and the only alley I was concerned with was the doubles alley. Clearly, they saw a different story for me.
Anyway, I read and enjoyed both books, and along with Time Magazine naming the IBM PC Man of the Year, they were probably somewhat responsible for my pursuing a career in software, computers, and technology from that point forward.
Two futurists that I’ve encountered in the last few weeks have me thinking again. And it’s exciting stuff if you don’t mind looking at the big picture, so to speak. And, wouldn’t you know, Mark Schaefer’s responsible for my discovery of one of those. You’ll want to read both of his posts that I link to below if you haven’t already.
I started reading Rolf Jensen’s The Dream Society a few weeks ago. He is the Director of The Copenhagen Institute for Future Studies. I could write many pages about this book and the thoughts that it has spurred but for the sake of this post, suffice it to say that he talks about the future as it will exist beyond the Information Age. He sees and defines six emotional needs and the markets that target those. The needs he defines are, adventure, togetherness, to care and be cared for, to define ourselves, to feel safe and secure, and, to demonstrate our convictions.
He feels that companies will need to harness these markets in order to prosper in the future. Will they do that with ever more advancing technology? How about with newer and better products and services? Nope. And if that’s the case, what a sea change for the world of business used to creating cookie cutter products and services and for our world interacting with those. Jensen proposes that the story behind the products will be what gives companies a leg up on their competition. He thinks that we will pay for stories that ignite our imaginations and reflect how we see ourselves and how we want to be seen by others. Stories, he says, that are capable of translating information into accessible emotional terms. Businesses need to imagine their futures the way good novelists imagine their stories, he advises.
Are any of you starting to see social media at play (or work if you prefer) in what he’s talking about? And mind you, he wrote this in 1999. Same year that other book was published, what was it again, oh yeah, Cluetrain Manifesto. Markets are conversations. Which you can also read about in Jim Tobin’s Social Media is a Cocktail Party. Mark wrote just over a week ago about the future of social media. It generated a lot of conversation (be sure to read the comments), and one of the people who contacted Mark as a result was Venessa Miemis, who has been writing about the future for the last seven years or so. She was gracious enough to talk with Mark about futurists, the future, social media and a few other very interesting topics.
“I do think we’re in a very transformative period in history, and we all need to hone our ‘futures thinking’ skills in order to actively participate in the process of shaping our collective future, instead of just being a passive bystander.”, she tells Mark early on in the interview. I think that’s exactly right. I think that the transformation she speaks of is happening because are moving out of the shadow of Gutenberg, where we were passive bystanders in terms of our information consumption. This was due to the fact that the distribution of information, enabled by Gutenberg’s invention, was so expensive that it had to become institutionalized in order to fulfill it’s promise of mass distribution. And it wasn’t just publishing and media conglomerates that we relied on to distribute that information. Large corporations, who could afford to print and distribute information to employees, shareholders, and journalists helped to shape our roles as passive bystanders as well. Our ever generous “corporate fathers.”
Now however, thanks to computers, some wonderful software and the internet, we are all able to publish and distribute information. That in turn has led to a new information space, social media. And as a result of that space, business models and organizations are being forced to change, to reinvent themselves, and their products and services. Because in that space, we are able to seek, exercise and give expression to those six needs that Jensen identified. That space is still young, vibrant and {grow}ing. As Venessa said “If we know more about each other, we may be able to begin collaborating on an enormous scale to solve some of the world’s serious problems.” The social media space may indeed enable something as grand as that. As it matures towards all of the things that it will eventually enable, it is also giving us all the opportunity to hone our stories and our storytelling skills, as we network within our various communities. That opportunity is not one to be squandered if, as Jensen proposes, storytellers, those who create the culture and image of company, will be the most generously rewarded leaders of organizations in the future.












{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }
This is a very powerful post. Like the way your brought it all together. You’ve also made me realize I need to read the Cluetrain Manifesto. I admit (shudder) that I have not read it. Seems to be a seminal work.
The transformation in publishing you speak of — saw today that the venerable Editor & Publisher is on its last legs and may not last another month. I don’t like transformations when we have to lose old friends like this. I think I’ve crossed the “old age” line where you go from leading the change to embracing comfort. Or perhaps it is the sheer rate of change that leaves me clinging to something, anything, familiar. Guess I better kick myself in the ass. Nobody wants to read a blog by a thought-laggard. : )
Thank you. That means a lot coming from you.
There is a 10th anniversary edition of Cluetrain available now. If you decide to buy it, make sure you get that one. You can also read the original online for free. Chris Anderson’s got nothing on them.
Your post on SM’s future and then the interview with Venessa made me realize that I probably need to frame the story about “story” through the lens of the transformation we are going through post Gutenberg. And I’ll tell you, I struggled for the longest time with the term “social media.” I’m much more comfortable with it in this light.
Since I’m about twice as old as you
I can completely relate to transformations that cost us old friends. My dear sweet wife still takes great comfort in the ritual that is “reading the daily paper.” I don’t know if you saw the story about Amazon signing Stephen Covey to an exclusive publishing contract, but that will go even further towards breaking down that institution.
You are anything but a thought-laggard. And be careful about kicking yourself in the ass. You could bruise yourself and the new wife might ask questions!
Thank you for a great (and thoughtful) post, Gregg. I think about the mass of information being amassed now, quite accidentally, and how — in a burst of critical mass — someone(s) will reach the means to sort, sift, link, and ignite discovery. Then I wonder if that someone will be marketers or, much worse, government agencies, parsing Facebook data in an effort to compile profiles for profit or propaganda. No doubt we are on the precipice of mankind’s greatest leap or worst fall. As we move to ever shorter (140-character), ever faster (pecha-kucha) communications, where is the time for thoughtful, careful conversation and consideration? Where is time for the traditional disciplines — philosophy, ethics, logic — through which both you and Mark are filtering this conversation? Do you think it will be blown away in the quickening storm?
Hi Nancy!
Well gee, I thought I was going to be able to stop thinking for the day. Thanks for making me re-engage. And thank you too for the kind words in your opening.
I suspect that you are exactly correct about someone(s) figuring out the means to sort, etc. I’m kind of looking forward to that and hope I’m still around to see it. I also suspect that regardless of who discovers that, marketers, government agencies and groups we probably don’t even know about yet, will be compiling just what you suggest for the motives you mention. I sense that you can see all of the bad things that might transpire from this. (I’m an old protester from the 60’s, I can relate to that.) I wonder, have you flipped the lens and thought about all of the really neat things that could happen as a result of that? I would bet that you have, and for my part, I am hopeful and excited by it. Sure, we could get flushed down the toilet. But, we could also advance to places we have only dreamed about. You put it very well in terms of the greatest leap or the worst fall. I’m betting on leap. Just as Gutenberg’s invention helped close the doors on the Dark Ages and launch ages of enlightenment, learning and invention (oh sure, there have been some bad times during those 500+ years), I’m betting that we see similar progress as we move forward through this time of transformation.
The issue of ever shorter and faster communications is one I think about a lot. I don’t have an answer yet but I have noticed a trend on Twitter towards more thoughtful tweets. Whether that’s a short or long term thing I don’t know. Blogging, as you might expect given the medium, seems to me much more thoughtful and geared toward generating conversation than it has in the past. I think that Mark’s blog is a glowing example of this. I think that the traditional disciplines will be able to weather the storm and may even be the stronger for it.
What do you think?
Hi Greg!
Thanks for the mention in this post. The Dream Society sounds great, I’m adding it to my book list now. I see you also have Linchpin under recommended reading – I just got that in the mail recently, just trying to find the time to read it.
I love what you’re getting at with storytelling – I’ve been exploring that as well with my research, and what happens when we move from Orality to Literacy to Digitization & Visuality. And also, as Nancy mentions above, where do ethics and logic and THINKING come in (or go out) with these new mediums?
If you haven’t read it yet, I’d recommend Walter Ong’s ‘Orality and Literacy’ for a very interesting read on how the printed word has altered the process of thinking over the centuries. I’m really curious about how that’s shifting again as more people are consuming video instead of reading. If you happen to come across any research about this, please send it my way. Thanks!
- @venessamiemis
http://www.emergentbydesign.com
Hi Venessa!
Thank goodness I go through Akismet piece by piece. For some reason it tagged your comment as spam. Clearly it doesn’t know how highly I think of you and your work.
I hope that you enjoy The Dream Society. I think it’s one of the seminal works on story and its place in our society. If you read it and get a chance to share your thoughts I’d love to hear them. Seth’s book is good as well. I think it’s his best yet. He tackles some very thorny issues. I suspect you’ll enjoy it a lot.
I have not read Ong’s work but I’ll head over to Amazon as soon as I post this. I can hardly wait to read that. And, I’ll keep my eye out for anything that deals with video as it relates to that and send it your way. That has my curiosity engaged as well. And in line with what you said about Orality –> Literacy –> Digitization –> Visuality, were we Graphical/Visual (drawings, etc.) before we were Oral? And if so, and if we are moving towards Visuality, are we circling or are we enhancing this new visual with our oral and literary history?
Love reading your blog and listening to you think about the future.
Best wishes,
Gregg