<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whose tweets would you pay to access?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greggmorris.com/whose-tweets-would-you-pay-to-access/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greggmorris.com/whose-tweets-would-you-pay-to-access</link>
	<description>Reinventing Yourself and Your Business...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gregg</title>
		<link>http://www.greggmorris.com/whose-tweets-would-you-pay-to-access/comment-page-1#comment-3312</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greggmorris.com/?p=3898#comment-3312</guid>
		<description>Well, I would pay for yours, of course! :-) All of that aside, you are neither arrogant nor dense as far as I&#039;m concerned. I&#039;m having a hard time with this myself. The question frames Twitter and tweets, influence and authority, in a whole new light as far as I can see. If we wouldn&#039;t pay for any content or content producer, what the hell are we doing expending effort on the service? And if that&#039;s so, what the hell is Twitter doing even thinking about this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I would pay for yours, of course! <img src='http://www.greggmorris.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  All of that aside, you are neither arrogant nor dense as far as I&#8217;m concerned. I&#8217;m having a hard time with this myself. The question frames Twitter and tweets, influence and authority, in a whole new light as far as I can see. If we wouldn&#8217;t pay for any content or content producer, what the hell are we doing expending effort on the service? And if that&#8217;s so, what the hell is Twitter doing even thinking about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark W Schaefer</title>
		<link>http://www.greggmorris.com/whose-tweets-would-you-pay-to-access/comment-page-1#comment-3311</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark W Schaefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greggmorris.com/?p=3898#comment-3311</guid>
		<description>A great question. 
Short answer: Nobody. 
Does that make me arrogant or dense?
I would pay for the overall service but no indivdual can earn their keep yet from my perspective. Great blog, Gregg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great question.<br />
Short answer: Nobody.<br />
Does that make me arrogant or dense?<br />
I would pay for the overall service but no indivdual can earn their keep yet from my perspective. Great blog, Gregg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
